Farm Subsidy information
Scott County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Scott County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 449
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $7,381,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Bernard J Debrock | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $7,488 |
102 | Anthony James Scherer | Scott City, MO 63780 | $7,439 |
103 | , | $7,228 | |
104 | Vetter Ci Farms LLC | Benton, MO 63736 | $7,200 |
105 | Ra-k, Inc. | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $7,178 |
106 | Michael & Gerald Landewee Partnership | Scott City, MO 63780 | $7,160 |
107 | Fuchs Brothers Partnership | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $7,148 |
108 | Thomas L Essner | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $6,971 |
109 | Thomas M Blattel | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $6,813 |
110 | Leeanna F Seiler | Scott City, MO 63780 | $6,790 |
111 | Steven G Glueck | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $6,644 |
112 | Monty Keesee | Scott City, MO 63780 | $6,607 |
113 | Yount Family Properties Lp | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $6,604 |
114 | , | $6,496 | |
115 | Gary Lynn | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $6,173 |
116 | Donny L Ort, Revocable Trust | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $5,986 |
117 | Carl Schott Farms Inc | Oran, MO 63771 | $5,878 |
118 | Jeffrey Kirn | Kelso, MO 63758 | $5,844 |
119 | , | $5,827 | |
120 | Dustin Essner | Benton, MO 63736 | $5,738 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”