Farm Subsidy information
Scott County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Scott County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 449
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $7,381,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brandon Gale Stewart | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $136,867 |
2 | Patrick Hulshof Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $121,085 |
3 | Heartland Potato Farm | Benton, MO 63736 | $82,902 |
4 | Colin Dean Stewart | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $78,608 |
5 | Faron Blaine Stewart | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $74,429 |
6 | Triple D Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $73,205 |
7 | Wolfhole Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $58,563 |
8 | Burger Farms & Ranches LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $50,721 |
9 | Blodgett LLC | Matthews, MO 63867 | $50,323 |
10 | Brazel Seed Company Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $49,853 |
11 | Sarah Kathryn Heckemeyer | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $48,657 |
12 | Mary Elizabeth Heckemeyer | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $48,646 |
13 | Northcut Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $40,736 |
14 | D & R Farms | Scott City, MO 63780 | $38,878 |
15 | S & S Ag Properties LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $37,316 |
16 | Burger Planting Co | Oran, MO 63771 | $37,007 |
17 | Mark A And Connie S Siebert - Siebert Farms | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $36,126 |
18 | Sweet Grass LLC | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $35,082 |
19 | Lusk Chapel Farms LLC | Charleston, MO 63834 | $33,665 |
20 | River Front Farms LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $28,880 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>