Market Gains in Scott County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 83
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $810,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthony J Landewee | Scott City, MO 63780 | $75,508 |
| 2 | Edward E Dement Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $67,829 |
| 3 | Holmes Farms | Oran, MO 63771 | $63,496 |
| 4 | Michael Mcmillan - Dba Mac Farm | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $50,191 |
| 5 | Dement Farms Partnership | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $27,179 |
| 6 | Herbert Schuerenberg Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $22,342 |
| 7 | Roy Edward Graviett | Oran, MO 63771 | $22,261 |
| 8 | Charles Joseph Lumsden | Scott City, MO 63780 | $21,992 |
| 9 | Delane Streeter | Oran, MO 63771 | $21,775 |
| 10 | Silverthorn Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $20,357 |
| 11 | Pearson Farms | Matthews, MO 63867 | $19,825 |
| 12 | Currie And Fitzgerald Heirs | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $19,277 |
| 13 | Riche La Terre Land Partnership L P | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $17,879 |
| 14 | Eric Kesler Farms | Vanduser, MO 63784 | $17,393 |
| 15 | Whitten & Whitten Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $17,383 |
| 16 | The North Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $17,168 |
| 17 | United Ridge Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $16,194 |
| 18 | Jones Land Company | Oran, MO 63771 | $14,415 |
| 19 | Holmes Land | Oran, MO 63771 | $13,087 |
| 20 | Billy G Watson | Charleston, MO 63834 | $12,245 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf