Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Texas County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 29
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Texas County, Missouri totaled $46,388 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nathan Keith Roth | Mountain Grove, MO 65711 | $5,446 |
| 2 | Jason Blackwelder | Elk Creek, MO 65464 | $3,214 |
| 3 | Paul Chateauvert | Mountain Grove, MO 65711 | $2,966 |
| 4 | Lucille Ann Pennington | Plato, MO 65552 | $2,750 |
| 5 | Larry Ramaeker | Mountain Grove, MO 65711 | $2,711 |
| 6 | James Ramaeker | Mountain Grove, MO 65711 | $2,640 |
| 7 | Ronald Emery | Warsaw, MO 65355 | $2,585 |
| 8 | Lee Beck | Cabool, MO 65689 | $2,394 |
| 9 | Jimmy Hutcheson | Huggins, MO 65484 | $2,036 |
| 10 | James Lewis Coats | Mountain Grove, MO 65711 | $1,910 |
| 11 | Julius Fraley | Houston, MO 65483 | $1,791 |
| 12 | Clear Spring Ranch Inc | Mountain Grove, MO 65711 | $1,746 |
| 13 | Margie Reiners | Cabool, MO 65689 | $1,595 |
| 14 | Ted Sheppard | Cabool, MO 65689 | $1,538 |
| 15 | Thomas M Coats | Mountain Grove, MO 65711 | $1,528 |
| 16 | Roger Nelson | Mountain Grove, MO 65711 | $1,270 |
| 17 | Roger Lee Kinder | Licking, MO 65542 | $878 |
| 18 | Burl Williams | Mountain Grove, MO 65711 | $843 |
| 19 | James N Rodgers | Licking, MO 65542 | $823 |
| 20 | V Robert Varosi | Cabool, MO 65689 | $796 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf