Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Montana, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 15,022

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Montana totaled $433,212,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
21S Ranch LLCCuster, MT 59024$539,165
22Riverview Colony IncChester, MT 59522$536,965
23East Malta Hutterian BrethrenMalta, MT 59538$516,532
24Birch Creek ColonyValier, MT 59486$514,333
25Prairie Elk Hutterian Brethren IncWolf Point, MT 59201$507,014
26Golden Valley Colony IncRyegate, MT 59074$500,000
27Twin Hills Colony IncCarter, MT 59420$500,000
28Fredrick D Wacker And Gwendolyn K Wacker Dba CrossMiles City, MT 59301$500,000
29Thompson Cattle Co., IncBillings, MT 59101$500,000
30Camrose Colony IncLedger, MT 59456$494,015
31Deerfield Hutterian Brethren IncLewistown, MT 59457$492,120
32Hillcrest Colony IncPower, MT 59468$489,882
33Hill Top Colony IncStockett, MT 59480$488,447
34Mccabe Joint VentureRedstone, MT 59257$488,427
35North Harlem Hutterian Brethren IncHarlem, MT 59526$479,110
36Hillside Colony IncSweet Grass, MT 59484$473,768
37Pondera Colony IncValier, MT 59486$472,912
38Birkeland Farms LlpFort Benton, MT 59442$469,380
39Schutter BrosManhattan, MT 59741$469,301
40Independence Bank **Havre, MT 59501$467,279

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag