Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 15,022
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Montana totaled $433,212,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | S Ranch LLC | Custer, MT 59024 | $539,165 |
22 | Riverview Colony Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $536,965 |
23 | East Malta Hutterian Brethren | Malta, MT 59538 | $516,532 |
24 | Birch Creek Colony | Valier, MT 59486 | $514,333 |
25 | Prairie Elk Hutterian Brethren Inc | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $507,014 |
26 | Golden Valley Colony Inc | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $500,000 |
27 | Twin Hills Colony Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $500,000 |
28 | Fredrick D Wacker And Gwendolyn K Wacker Dba Cross | Miles City, MT 59301 | $500,000 |
29 | Thompson Cattle Co., Inc | Billings, MT 59101 | $500,000 |
30 | Camrose Colony Inc | Ledger, MT 59456 | $494,015 |
31 | Deerfield Hutterian Brethren Inc | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $492,120 |
32 | Hillcrest Colony Inc | Power, MT 59468 | $489,882 |
33 | Hill Top Colony Inc | Stockett, MT 59480 | $488,447 |
34 | Mccabe Joint Venture | Redstone, MT 59257 | $488,427 |
35 | North Harlem Hutterian Brethren Inc | Harlem, MT 59526 | $479,110 |
36 | Hillside Colony Inc | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $473,768 |
37 | Pondera Colony Inc | Valier, MT 59486 | $472,912 |
38 | Birkeland Farms Llp | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $469,380 |
39 | Schutter Bros | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $469,301 |
40 | Independence Bank ** | Havre, MT 59501 | $467,279 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”