Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 14,799
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Montana totaled $421,659,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,219,334 |
| 2 | Mac's Farm | Dutton, MT 59433 | $973,460 |
| 3 | Springwater Colony Inc | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $750,000 |
| 4 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $745,086 |
| 5 | First Community Bank ** | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $736,022 |
| 6 | Brown Farms Of Montana | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $734,742 |
| 7 | Neufeld Farms Partnership | Larslan, MT 59244 | $688,634 |
| 8 | Hilldale Colony Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $605,979 |
| 9 | Big Rose Colony Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $603,816 |
| 10 | Arcadia Ag, LLC | Dillon, MT 59725 | $600,017 |
| 11 | Torgerson Farms Partnership | Ethridge, MT 59435 | $584,602 |
| 12 | Patriot Farms | Billings, MT 59107 | $571,171 |
| 13 | Glacier Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $569,956 |
| 14 | Horizon Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $560,202 |
| 15 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $557,376 |
| 16 | Big Sky Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $553,927 |
| 17 | Cayuse Livestock Co | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $549,727 |
| 18 | Vermilion Ranch | Terry, MT 59349 | $547,258 |
| 19 | S Ranch LLC | Custer, MT 59024 | $539,165 |
| 20 | East Malta Hutterian Brethren | Malta, MT 59538 | $516,532 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf