Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,286
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Montana totaled $11,481,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Sage Creek Colony Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $53,051 |
22 | Rimrock Colony Inc | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $50,936 |
23 | Springdale Colony | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $50,808 |
24 | Schuler Bros | Carter, MT 59420 | $50,497 |
25 | Midway Colony Inc | Conrad, MT 59425 | $50,088 |
26 | Kingsbury Colony | Valier, MT 59486 | $48,517 |
27 | Milford Colony Inc | Wolf Creek, MT 59648 | $47,342 |
28 | Orville & Arlene Skogen Dba Skogen Ranch | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $47,242 |
29 | Glendale Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $46,838 |
30 | T & C Cahill Farms | Scobey, MT 59263 | $46,147 |
31 | Northern Acres LLC | Scobey, MT 59263 | $45,476 |
32 | New Miami Colony | Conrad, MT 59425 | $45,255 |
33 | Zenith Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $42,859 |
34 | Turner Hutterian Brethren Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $40,901 |
35 | Leck Joint Venture | Galata, MT 59444 | $39,831 |
36 | London Hills Farm LLC | Harrison, MT 59735 | $39,332 |
37 | Rockport Colony Inc | Pendroy, MT 59467 | $38,518 |
38 | Cross W Livestock LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $35,298 |
39 | Growing Green Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $34,726 |
40 | S&w Ag, LLC | Chester, MT 59522 | $32,343 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”