Farm Subsidy information
Montana
Total Subsidies in Montana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 15,006
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Montana totaled $366,123,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Occ-o'connor Crops & Cattle LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $379,665 |
22 | Hilldale Colony Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $372,336 |
23 | Dan Bird | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $372,003 |
24 | Glacier Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $360,957 |
25 | Twin Hills Colony Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $350,969 |
26 | First State Bank Of Shelby ** | Shelby, MT 59474 | $348,167 |
27 | North Harlem Hutterian Brethren Inc | Harlem, MT 59526 | $342,832 |
28 | Loring Hutterian Brethren | Loring, MT 59537 | $324,192 |
29 | Mccabe Joint Venture | Redstone, MT 59257 | $319,422 |
30 | Prairie Elk Hutterian Brethren Inc | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $316,529 |
31 | Hidden Valley Colony Inc | Gildford, MT 59525 | $310,856 |
32 | Big Rose Colony Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $306,590 |
33 | Krd Farms | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $295,599 |
34 | Hidden Lake Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $295,028 |
35 | Simonson Ranch Inc | Billings, MT 59106 | $294,191 |
36 | Riverview Colony Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $283,542 |
37 | Kenny L Nielsen | Dagmar, MT 59219 | $283,030 |
38 | Deerfield Hutterian Brethren Inc | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $279,840 |
39 | Horizon Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $279,398 |
40 | O'hara Land & Cattle | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $275,708 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”