Total Commodity Programs in Montana, 2019

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 13,216

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Montana totaled $215,712,000 in in 2019.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
2019
1Stockman Bank **Conrad, MT 59425$9,346,014
2Independence Bank **Havre, MT 59501$5,132,791
3Northwest Farm Credit Service **Great Falls, MT 59405$3,798,545
4First Community Bank **Glasgow, MT 59230$1,632,516
5Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$1,579,828
6First Security Bank **Roundup, MT 59072$1,348,963
7Rocky Mountain Bank **Plentywood, MT 59254$672,421
8Opportunity Bank Of Montana **Dutton, MT 59433$655,837
9Bank Of Bridger **Plentywood, MT 59254$655,437
10Glacier Bank **Choteau, MT 59422$545,576
11Brown Farms Of MontanaWolf Point, MT 59201$484,301
12Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust LanHelena, MT 59620$482,151
13Torgerson Farms PartnershipEthridge, MT 59435$464,539
14Patriot FarmsBillings, MT 59107$462,002
15Neufeld Farms PartnershipLarslan, MT 59244$460,615
16Mccone County Federal Credit UnioCircle, MT 59215$446,453
17Springwater Colony IncHarlowton, MT 59036$427,150
18Big Sky Colony IncCut Bank, MT 59427$400,547
19American Bank Center **Dickinson, ND 58601$381,459
20Hilldale Colony IncHavre, MT 59501$372,336

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag