Emergency Conservation Program in Montana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 103
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Montana totaled $1,558,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | L O Cattle Company | Sand Springs, MT 59077 | $183,304 |
| 2 | Newman Ayers Ranch Inc | Ismay, MT 59336 | $161,285 |
| 3 | Browning Partnership | Winnett, MT 59087 | $101,734 |
| 4 | Chippewa Cree Tribe | Box Elder, MT 59521 | $65,851 |
| 5 | Bliss Livestock | Sand Springs, MT 59077 | $48,804 |
| 6 | Duane Tangen | Harlem, MT 59526 | $48,101 |
| 7 | Thornwood Company | Reserve, MT 59258 | $46,598 |
| 8 | Jonathan Lee Seleg | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $44,341 |
| 9 | Steven Andrew Seleg | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $38,749 |
| 10 | Killen Land & Livestock | Angela, MT 59312 | $33,127 |
| 11 | Bryan A Kellam | Chinook, MT 59523 | $28,451 |
| 12 | Dan L Eddy | Livingston, MT 59047 | $27,621 |
| 13 | Terrett Ranch Co | Miles City, MT 59301 | $26,989 |
| 14 | Kisler Ranch LLC | Las Vegas, NV 89119 | $26,578 |
| 15 | Coal Creek Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $25,662 |
| 16 | Jay F Murnion | Miles City, MT 59301 | $25,280 |
| 17 | Milam Basin Creek Ranch Llp | Bozeman, MT 59715 | $24,975 |
| 18 | Joseph M Toth | Havre, MT 59501 | $24,476 |
| 19 | Marsh Land & Livestock Inc | Reserve, MT 59258 | $23,404 |
| 20 | Catlin Ranch Lp | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $22,646 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf