Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 11,193
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Montana totaled $235,264,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tranel Ranch | Billings, MT 59106 | $420,525 |
22 | Mccabe Joint Venture | Redstone, MT 59257 | $405,438 |
23 | Cottom Seed Inc | Dillon, MT 59725 | $403,527 |
24 | V S Inc | Sidney, MT 59270 | $394,303 |
25 | I X Ranch Co | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $390,060 |
26 | Foster Ranch & Feedlot Inc | Melstone, MT 59054 | $382,714 |
27 | Spring Creek Farms Inc | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $380,125 |
28 | Elk Creek Colony Inc | Augusta, MT 59410 | $371,380 |
29 | Leep Dairy LLC | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $368,391 |
30 | Huntsman Ranch Co | Dell, MT 59724 | $339,267 |
31 | Riverview Colony Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $332,014 |
32 | Kirkland Ranch LLC | Fort Peck, MT 59223 | $328,731 |
33 | Big Sky Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $328,200 |
34 | Montgomery Ranch Co | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $327,077 |
35 | Dick Hirschy Cattle Inc | Wisdom, MT 59761 | $322,109 |
36 | Pondera Colony Inc | Valier, MT 59486 | $321,369 |
37 | Sitz Angus Ranch & Livestock Operation | Harrison, MT 59735 | $317,890 |
38 | Mcfarland & White Ranch Inc | Two Dot, MT 59085 | $312,872 |
39 | Big Stone Colony Inc | Sand Coulee, MT 59472 | $310,105 |
40 | Cross W Livestock LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $307,659 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”