Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 8,724
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Montana totaled $49,005,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $266,659 |
| 2 | Cayuse Livestock Co | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $262,518 |
| 3 | Singleton Farms | Miles City, MT 59301 | $254,137 |
| 4 | Frenchman Valley Ranch Ptnrshp | Saco, MT 59261 | $189,845 |
| 5 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $156,750 |
| 6 | Flying U LLC | Missoula, MT 59808 | $123,358 |
| 7 | Montgomery Ranch Co | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $121,619 |
| 8 | Cornwell Ranch | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $117,043 |
| 9 | Ashcraft Ranch Inc | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $115,183 |
| 10 | Orville & Arlene Skogen Dba Skogen Ranch | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $101,098 |
| 11 | Page Whitham Land & Cattle Llp | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $97,971 |
| 12 | Vogel Land & Cattle Co | Ballantine, MT 59006 | $96,862 |
| 13 | Foster Ranch & Feedlot Inc | Melstone, MT 59054 | $93,032 |
| 14 | Dick Hirschy Cattle Inc | Wisdom, MT 59761 | $91,988 |
| 15 | The First State Bank Of Malta | Malta, MT 59538 | $86,842 |
| 16 | Walter Gruel & Son Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $85,333 |
| 17 | Centennial Livestock | Dillon, MT 59725 | $80,617 |
| 18 | Cross W Livestock LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $80,579 |
| 19 | Sitz Angus Ranch & Livestock Operation | Harrison, MT 59735 | $80,099 |
| 20 | Jason And Tanya Brewer | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $79,276 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf