Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 15,022
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Montana totaled $433,212,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $1,226,591 |
2 | Mac's Farm | Dutton, MT 59433 | $1,118,151 |
3 | Springwater Colony Inc | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $750,000 |
4 | Brown Farms Of Montana | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $750,000 |
5 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $745,086 |
6 | First Community Bank ** | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $736,022 |
7 | Big Rose Colony Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $694,388 |
8 | Neufeld Farms Partnership | Larslan, MT 59244 | $688,634 |
9 | Glacier Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $655,450 |
10 | Horizon Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $644,234 |
11 | Big Sky Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $637,018 |
12 | Hilldale Colony Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $605,979 |
13 | Arcadia Ag, LLC | Dillon, MT 59725 | $600,017 |
14 | Hidden Lake Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $585,134 |
15 | Torgerson Farms Partnership | Ethridge, MT 59435 | $584,602 |
16 | S Farms | Miles City, MT 59301 | $576,800 |
17 | Patriot Farms | Billings, MT 59107 | $571,171 |
18 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $557,376 |
19 | Cayuse Livestock Co | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $549,727 |
20 | Vermilion Ranch | Terry, MT 59349 | $547,258 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>