Dairy Programs in Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 45
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Montana totaled $3,638,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Springwater Colony Inc | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $158,243 |
| 2 | Riverview Colony Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $127,175 |
| 3 | Pleasant Valley Colony | Belt, MT 59412 | $127,174 |
| 4 | Big Stone Colony Inc | Sand Coulee, MT 59472 | $127,173 |
| 5 | Dairyland Farms Inc | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $127,173 |
| 6 | Plain-vista Dairy LLC | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $127,173 |
| 7 | David Lewis | Victor, MT 59875 | $127,173 |
| 8 | Bos Dairy LLC | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $127,173 |
| 9 | Moiese Valley Ranch LLC | Burley, ID 83318 | $127,173 |
| 10 | Leep Dairy LLC | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $127,173 |
| 11 | Pondera Colony Inc | Valier, MT 59486 | $127,173 |
| 12 | Cascade Colony Inc | Sun River, MT 59483 | $127,172 |
| 13 | Surprise Creek Hutterian Brethern | Stanford, MT 59479 | $118,251 |
| 14 | Fairhaven Colony Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $116,368 |
| 15 | Faith Dairy LLC | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $112,623 |
| 16 | Deerfield Hutterian Brethren Inc | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $110,486 |
| 17 | Camrose Colony Inc | Ledger, MT 59456 | $105,893 |
| 18 | Birch Creek Colony | Valier, MT 59486 | $98,134 |
| 19 | Martinsdale Colony | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $89,345 |
| 20 | Kingsbury Colony | Valier, MT 59486 | $86,362 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf