Total Disaster Programs in Carter County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 173
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Carter County, Montana totaled $2,108,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jason King | Hammond, MT 59332 | $14,163 |
42 | Maureen Nixon | Alzada, MT 59311 | $13,758 |
43 | Bryce Padden | Camp Crook, SD 57724 | $12,788 |
44 | Borchgrevink Livestock | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $12,688 |
45 | Wolff Ranch Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $12,597 |
46 | Jb Cattle Company | Plevna, MT 59344 | $11,946 |
47 | Tim Mcinerney | Alzada, MT 59311 | $11,508 |
48 | Laird Ranch LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $11,243 |
49 | Jerry Cathey | Hammond, MT 59332 | $10,862 |
50 | Darlene Stieg | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $10,361 |
51 | Meyer Family Lllp | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $10,025 |
52 | Courtney Herefords | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $9,433 |
53 | Dale King | Hammond, MT 59332 | $8,986 |
54 | Castleberry Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $8,903 |
55 | F & R Ranches Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $8,850 |
56 | S & L Sheep Ranch Inc | Alzada, MT 59311 | $8,465 |
57 | Randell Gene Arpan | Alzada, MT 59311 | $8,247 |
58 | Leroy Schallenberger | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $8,077 |
59 | Minnesota Supreme Feeders Inc | Lamberton, MN 56152 | $8,038 |
60 | Kathy Kittelmann | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $7,799 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”