SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 569
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $21,894,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Robert C & Kenneth C Yirsa | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $110,514 |
42 | Hillview Farm Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $110,512 |
43 | Royce E Applegate | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $109,707 |
44 | Kem & Terry Allen Partnership | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $107,724 |
45 | Steve Witt | Loma, MT 59460 | $105,868 |
46 | R T D Farm Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $103,390 |
47 | Birkeland & Sons Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $103,371 |
48 | Anderson Partnership | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $103,349 |
49 | Wishman Farms Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $103,212 |
50 | Hcf P/s | Highwood, MT 59450 | $101,791 |
51 | F J Haxton Inc | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $100,000 |
52 | D & W Farming Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $100,000 |
53 | Cj Farms Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $100,000 |
54 | H & H Cropping Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $100,000 |
55 | Twin Hills Colony Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $100,000 |
56 | Dusty Road Farm Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $100,000 |
57 | Jesco Agriculture Inc | Brady, MT 59416 | $100,000 |
58 | Charles Good Ranch Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $100,000 |
59 | Beirwagen Farms | Loma, MT 59460 | $99,862 |
60 | Hollandsworth Lands Inc | Brady, MT 59416 | $97,888 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”