SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 569
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $21,894,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Spring Coulee Land & Cattle | Highwood, MT 59450 | $394,510 |
2 | Schuler Bros | Carter, MT 59420 | $300,000 |
3 | Sternberg Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $235,427 |
4 | Golden Acres Farm Inc | Brady, MT 59416 | $227,833 |
5 | Jeff Good | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $224,441 |
6 | T & M Farming | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $200,000 |
7 | Daka Farms | Carter, MT 59420 | $199,758 |
8 | Charlson Ranch Co | Carter, MT 59420 | $199,230 |
9 | Owen Farm Co | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $192,764 |
10 | Missouri Breaks Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $188,735 |
11 | Worrall Brothers Farm Partnership | Loma, MT 59460 | $182,556 |
12 | Birkeland Bros | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $159,468 |
13 | Bailey Land & Livestock Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $159,194 |
14 | Eagle Butte Grain Partners | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $158,094 |
15 | Joy M Trunk | Bigfork, MT 59911 | $154,520 |
16 | David A Rowland | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $152,666 |
17 | Lms Grain Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $152,420 |
18 | Paul J & Jerri L Dostal Llp | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $151,980 |
19 | Rodney L Clark | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $150,741 |
20 | Walker Co Inc | Floweree, MT 59440 | $148,266 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>