SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 569
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $21,894,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Donald Hansen & Son Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $66,008 |
122 | Lonesome Prairie Farm Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $66,000 |
123 | Mark Reichelt | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $65,119 |
124 | Arganbright Farms | Carter, MT 59420 | $65,103 |
125 | Dick's Farm Inc | Dutton, MT 59433 | $65,053 |
126 | Onstad Grain Co | Great Falls, MT 59403 | $64,953 |
127 | Prairie Sage Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $64,921 |
128 | C D Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $64,586 |
129 | D J M Farms Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $63,843 |
130 | Brent Crawford | Carter, MT 59420 | $63,352 |
131 | Prairie Breezes Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $63,044 |
132 | Harvey Lee Keller | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $63,015 |
133 | Carl Wishman | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $62,433 |
134 | John A Bronec | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $61,926 |
135 | Betty A Bronec | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $61,918 |
136 | Lloyd Danbrook | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $61,396 |
137 | Cgw Farms | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $61,126 |
138 | Darrel Benjamin | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $61,115 |
139 | Andrew Thull Tuw | Boise, ID 83701 | $60,529 |
140 | A W Baack | Carter, MT 59420 | $59,917 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”