Production Flexibility Program in Custer County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 283
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Custer County, Montana totaled $7,363,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Leland Ranch Inc | Ismay, MT 59336 | $82,342 |
22 | Bice Ranch LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $82,013 |
23 | William C Jones | Miles City, MT 59301 | $81,072 |
24 | Clinton Kelstrup | Miles City, MT 59301 | $76,809 |
25 | Mcaulay Ranch Co | Terry, MT 59349 | $75,567 |
26 | Edythe M Hardy | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $71,371 |
27 | Hardy Family Trust | Miles City, MT 59301 | $71,371 |
28 | James H Bird | Volborg, MT 59351 | $68,502 |
29 | Marlyn Janssen | Miles City, MT 59301 | $68,312 |
30 | Donald Bice | Miles City, MT 59301 | $67,723 |
31 | Christian J Lund Trust | Miles City, MT 59301 | $64,833 |
32 | Keystone Ranches Inc | Ismay, MT 59336 | $62,374 |
33 | Estate Of Wanda J Swope | Miles City, MT 59301 | $62,325 |
34 | Cap Rock Ranch Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $60,964 |
35 | Charles J Jonutis | Miles City, MT 59301 | $59,743 |
36 | Sammy Stinson | Miles City, MT 59301 | $55,749 |
37 | Estate Of Donald Mcrae | Miles City, MT 59301 | $53,826 |
38 | Dnrc Trust Land Management - Exem | Helena, MT 59620 | $50,462 |
39 | B Quarter Circle Ranch Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $49,532 |
40 | Leo Billing | Miles City, MT 59301 | $48,501 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”