Production Flexibility Program in Custer County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 283
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Custer County, Montana totaled $7,363,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mizpah Farm | Miles City, MT 59301 | $260,924 |
2 | John Hamilton | Miles City, MT 59301 | $206,068 |
3 | Charles Steadman | Alzada, MT 59311 | $196,259 |
4 | Swope Ranch LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $194,380 |
5 | Leslie Farming | Miles City, MT 59301 | $189,224 |
6 | Solaris Homes Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $173,369 |
7 | William J Krutzfeldt | Miles City, MT 59301 | $170,131 |
8 | Lewis John Krutzfeldt | Powderville, MT 59345 | $157,661 |
9 | Hirsch Ranch Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $151,788 |
10 | Michael David Ballensky | Miles City, MT 59301 | $148,096 |
11 | B B & H Ranch Company | Miles City, MT 59301 | $135,808 |
12 | Krutzfeldt Ranch LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $129,313 |
13 | Karen Krutzfeldt | Powderville, MT 59345 | $128,998 |
14 | John Bruce Lockie | Miles City, MT 59301 | $116,160 |
15 | Estate Of Gerard C Lund | Billings, MT 59102 | $107,055 |
16 | J Deibel Wheat & Cattle | Miles City, MT 59301 | $88,278 |
17 | Daniel D Doran | Miles City, MT 59301 | $88,125 |
18 | Jay Dee Hirsch | Miles City, MT 59301 | $86,487 |
19 | W L Ranch Co | Buffalo, WY 82834 | $85,727 |
20 | David P Dagenhart | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $82,442 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>