Production Flexibility Program in Custer County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 283
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Custer County, Montana totaled $7,363,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Dale Hirsch | Kinsey, MT 59338 | $21,335 |
102 | Don Beumer | Waite Park, MN 56387 | $21,307 |
103 | Meidinger Farms Inc | Kinsey, MT 59338 | $21,303 |
104 | Betty Lamendola | Miles City, MT 59301 | $21,290 |
105 | Steven Lackman | Miles City, MT 59301 | $20,811 |
106 | Betty Hopkins | Ismay, MT 59336 | $20,206 |
107 | Richard J Anderson | Miles City, MT 59301 | $19,815 |
108 | John C Colvin | Miles City, MT 59301 | $19,570 |
109 | Leslie R Beyl | Miles City, MT 59301 | $19,407 |
110 | Del & Bernice Carey Living Trust | Volborg, MT 59351 | $19,150 |
111 | Lance Bice | Miles City, MT 59301 | $18,989 |
112 | Bill Bergerson | Miles City, MT 59301 | $18,584 |
113 | Elsie Wolff | Miles City, MT 59301 | $18,457 |
114 | N Carey Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $18,299 |
115 | Maynard Borner | Miles City, MT 59301 | $17,475 |
116 | Charles Thomas Pezzarossi | Roberts, MT 59070 | $17,379 |
117 | Gary Smith | Lincoln, MT 59639 | $17,142 |
118 | Gordon E Sweet | Miles City, MT 59301 | $16,714 |
119 | Sergey Mentikov | Miles City, MT 59301 | $16,702 |
120 | Michael B Toennis | Miles City, MT 59301 | $16,589 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”