Farm Subsidy information
Deer Lodge County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Deer Lodge County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 134
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Deer Lodge County, Montana totaled $6,691,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dry Cottonwood LLC | Missoula, MT 59807 | $7,420 |
62 | Solo Show Stock LLC | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $6,852 |
63 | Clifford Galle | Anaconda, MT 59711 | $6,799 |
64 | James P Mcleod | Butte, MT 59750 | $6,122 |
65 | Darrell J Rogers | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $6,088 |
66 | Deborah D Kelley | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $6,070 |
67 | Linda M Johnson | Warm Springs, MT 59756 | $5,704 |
68 | Virgil Gochanour - Dba Crowded Acres Ranch | Anaconda, MT 59711 | $5,657 |
69 | Paul Chirico Jr | Anaconda, MT 59711 | $5,626 |
70 | Peggy Beck | Belgrade, MT 59714 | $5,521 |
71 | Jesse Peterson | Dillon, MT 59725 | $5,293 |
72 | Broken Circle Ranch Co Inc | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $5,107 |
73 | Raymond D Gallik | Anaconda, MT 59711 | $4,683 |
74 | David O Kesler II | Philipsburg, MT 59858 | $4,294 |
75 | Susan Balentine | Butte, MT 59701 | $4,210 |
76 | , | $4,115 | |
77 | Timothy A Riddle | Anaconda, MT 59711 | $3,968 |
78 | Floyd C Balentine | Butte, MT 59701 | $3,849 |
79 | , | $3,757 | |
80 | Travis Mckelvy | Anaconda, MT 59711 | $3,651 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”