Farm Subsidy information
Deer Lodge County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Deer Lodge County, Montana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 22
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Deer Lodge County, Montana totaled $162,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brad Anderson Farm Limited Prt | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $52,597 |
| 2 | Ueland Agra Farms | Butte, MT 59701 | $41,729 |
| 3 | R Bar N Ranch LLC | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $14,340 |
| 4 | David M Beck | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $7,242 |
| 5 | Daniel J Kelley | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $6,900 |
| 6 | R S And N Johnson Ranch LLC | Anaconda, MT 59711 | $3,996 |
| 7 | Theresa M Diaz | Butte, MT 59701 | $3,605 |
| 8 | Raoul F Diaz Jr | Butte, MT 59701 | $3,605 |
| 9 | Reinhardt Ranch Co | Wise River, MT 59762 | $3,540 |
| 10 | Clark Fork Coalition | Missoula, MT 59807 | $3,186 |
| 11 | Dennis S Demers | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $3,184 |
| 12 | Ueland Ranches Inc | Ramsay, MT 59748 | $3,076 |
| 13 | Justin Nicholes | Anaconda, MT 59711 | $2,856 |
| 14 | Linda M Johnson | Anaconda, MT 59711 | $2,448 |
| 15 | Peterson Fairmont Ranch Inc | Anaconda, MT 59711 | $1,734 |
| 16 | Vanisko Ranches Inc | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $1,651 |
| 17 | Matthew L Smith | Opportunity, MT 59711 | $1,332 |
| 18 | Brandy J Davis | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $1,327 |
| 19 | Lampert Ranch Lp | Anaconda, MT 59711 | $1,150 |
| 20 | Logan Ranch LLC | Anaconda, MT 59711 | $1,146 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf