Farm Subsidy information
Fergus County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Fergus County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 609
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Fergus County, Montana totaled $32,604,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Roger L Peters | Roy, MT 59471 | $99,499 |
82 | Cory Merrill | Buffalo, MT 59418 | $97,842 |
83 | Mark Heggem | Winifred, MT 59489 | $97,550 |
84 | 3 Butte Ranch LLC | Grass Range, MT 59032 | $97,439 |
85 | David J Wickens | Hilger, MT 59451 | $96,660 |
86 | David Bergum | Winifred, MT 59489 | $94,790 |
87 | Monte S Harrison | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $93,951 |
88 | Eickhoff Ranch | Grass Range, MT 59032 | $93,649 |
89 | Breck Carpenter | Denton, MT 59430 | $93,619 |
90 | Descheemaeker Herefords | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $92,433 |
91 | Lyle M Shammel | Hilger, MT 59451 | $92,280 |
92 | Walter Wichman | Hilger, MT 59451 | $91,825 |
93 | Slivka Farms LLC | Winifred, MT 59489 | $91,639 |
94 | Buffalo Creek Farm & Ranch LLC | Moore, MT 59464 | $91,374 |
95 | David Udelhoven | Winifred, MT 59489 | $91,227 |
96 | Two Calf Cattle Company LLC | Williston, ND 58801 | $89,200 |
97 | Dvorak Family Ltd Partnership | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $88,686 |
98 | Philip L Schuman | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $88,591 |
99 | Raymond Koch | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $88,185 |
100 | Lane L Lucas | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $88,150 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”