Farm Subsidy information
Glacier County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Glacier County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 283
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $16,338,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jvmmc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $105,131 |
22 | Glacier Farms Inc | Valier, MT 59486 | $99,938 |
23 | Barcus Ranch | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $99,583 |
24 | Cattail Acres, Inc. | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $99,299 |
25 | Francis M Bird | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $94,395 |
26 | Ricky Ray Winkowitsch | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $92,777 |
27 | Vasboe Ag, Inc. | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $92,412 |
28 | Fred N Volkman | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $91,801 |
29 | Hughie W Monroe | Browning, MT 59417 | $84,331 |
30 | C9 Cattle LLC | Anaconda, MT 59711 | $76,824 |
31 | Blue Skies Farms Inc | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $76,013 |
32 | Landslide Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $73,682 |
33 | Neal Woldstad | Valier, MT 59486 | $72,097 |
34 | Rumney Ranch | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $70,419 |
35 | Purnee Brandvold | Browning, MT 59417 | $68,128 |
36 | South Milk River Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $67,923 |
37 | Kylan Ray Berkram | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $67,237 |
38 | Ronald L Johnson | East Glacier Park, MT 59434 | $66,854 |
39 | Gilbert England | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $66,203 |
40 | Rick L Whitford | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $65,451 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”