Total Commodity Programs in Glacier County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 402
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $10,983,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glacier Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $541,562 |
| 2 | Hidden Lake Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $537,754 |
| 3 | Big Sky Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $494,623 |
| 4 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $486,191 |
| 5 | Zenith Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $404,596 |
| 6 | Growing Green Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $350,684 |
| 7 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $326,091 |
| 8 | Horizon Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $303,964 |
| 9 | Rock Creek Farm Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $238,088 |
| 10 | Seville Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $220,908 |
| 11 | Glendale Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $187,892 |
| 12 | Rocky Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $185,684 |
| 13 | R L Johnson Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $184,252 |
| 14 | South Milk River Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $171,463 |
| 15 | Robert E Wellman Jr | Valier, MT 59486 | $169,323 |
| 16 | Gilham Creek Farm Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $148,878 |
| 17 | Eney Family Farms | Kalispell, MT 59904 | $148,588 |
| 18 | Barcus Ranch | Browning, MT 59417 | $148,222 |
| 19 | Eney Farms 2015 | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $133,188 |
| 20 | Joan Wellman | Valier, MT 59486 | $131,585 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf