Farm Subsidy information
Glacier County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Glacier County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 347
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $14,308,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Rodney D Hibbs | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $20,800 |
82 | William Roy Whitford | Browning, MT 59417 | $20,469 |
83 | Andrew Schildt | Browning, MT 59417 | $20,296 |
84 | Diamond Box Livestock Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $19,842 |
85 | , | $19,649 | |
86 | Jacqueline A Parsons | Browning, MT 59417 | $19,549 |
87 | Brandon R Lane | Browning, MT 59417 | $19,352 |
88 | , | $19,305 | |
89 | , | $17,800 | |
90 | Raleigh G King | Browning, MT 59417 | $17,731 |
91 | Curtis L Halvorson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $17,324 |
92 | Twila Wahl | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $17,288 |
93 | James Karl Andrew Heptner | Browning, MT 59417 | $16,659 |
94 | George G Kipp III | Heart Butte, MT 59448 | $16,658 |
95 | Beau W. Michael | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $16,268 |
96 | Justin Robert Pfeifer | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $16,046 |
97 | Jay Bob Lytle | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $15,783 |
98 | Lyle S Stgoddard Sr | Browning, MT 59417 | $15,717 |
99 | Kevin John Connelly | Browning, MT 59417 | $15,567 |
100 | Kylan Ray Berkram | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $15,406 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”