Total Commodity Programs in Glacier County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 1,059
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $140,111,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | K C Walburger | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $221,477 |
162 | First Interstate Bank ** | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $221,321 |
163 | Brandon Gregory Brooks | Whitefish, MT 59937 | $220,957 |
164 | William Icenoggle | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $212,190 |
165 | Cody Walburger | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $204,434 |
166 | Bart L // Kimmet | Helena, MT 59604 | $204,132 |
167 | R & R Bronec Grain & Cattle | Carter, MT 59420 | $200,403 |
168 | Marias River Land & Livestock | Cascade, MT 59421 | $197,079 |
169 | // C D A Farms | Unknown, MT 11111 | $196,356 |
170 | Raleigh G King | Browning, MT 59417 | $196,274 |
171 | Berkram Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $195,557 |
172 | Jc Seewald | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $193,496 |
173 | G Craig Rice | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $191,442 |
174 | Roger D Vermulm | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $190,537 |
175 | Edward W Bouma | Choteau, MT 59422 | $186,736 |
176 | R W Michaels Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $184,229 |
177 | Torgerson & Sons Inc | Ethridge, MT 59435 | $179,625 |
178 | Juletta Coleman | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $174,732 |
179 | Rebecca Ballard | Riverton, UT 84065 | $173,593 |
180 | Fred Johnson | Browning, MT 59417 | $170,161 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”