Farm Subsidy information
Glacier County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Glacier County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,575
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $355,682,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | C W Cooper Farms, Inc. | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,896,175 |
22 | Torgerson Farms Partnership | Ethridge, MT 59435 | $1,846,519 |
23 | Casey Wellman | Valier, MT 59486 | $1,834,028 |
24 | Gilham Creek Farm Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,799,344 |
25 | First State Company | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,782,044 |
26 | Tom R Johnson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,774,639 |
27 | Harvey Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,678,635 |
28 | Mountain Breeze Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,642,844 |
29 | Growing Green Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,620,928 |
30 | Rocky Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,608,866 |
31 | Twila Wahl | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,587,604 |
32 | Hanson Inc | Kalispell, MT 59901 | $1,568,535 |
33 | Sidney G Brandon | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,550,850 |
34 | David J Broberg | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,547,592 |
35 | Barbara Broberg | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,516,785 |
36 | Liane Johnson Dba Lj Johnson Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,504,048 |
37 | Roger Sammons | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,497,963 |
38 | Mark Lewis | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,492,624 |
39 | Sutacres Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,486,998 |
40 | Altenburg Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,419,466 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”