Farm Subsidy information
Glacier County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Glacier County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,575
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $355,682,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Russell Wahl | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $1,415,368 |
42 | Blue Skies Farms Inc | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $1,371,486 |
43 | David Cooper | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,334,017 |
44 | Silver Dell Ranch Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,299,798 |
45 | Barcus Ranch | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,258,820 |
46 | Landslide Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,256,973 |
47 | Boundary Cattle Co Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,255,448 |
48 | Roger Hibbs | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,255,170 |
49 | West Rim Agriculture Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,240,811 |
50 | T Tom Tuma | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,239,545 |
51 | Ricky Ray Winkowitsch | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,213,335 |
52 | Vermulm Farms, Inc. | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,208,836 |
53 | Lisa Ray Sammons | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,207,478 |
54 | Rumney Ranch | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,202,086 |
55 | M Robert Lytle | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,186,494 |
56 | Michael J Loring | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,172,277 |
57 | Loraine Wahl | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $1,138,240 |
58 | Little Rock Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,133,851 |
59 | Glen R Pfeifer | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,127,403 |
60 | James Edwards | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,127,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”