Farm Subsidy information
Glacier County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Glacier County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 283
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $16,338,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Horizon Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $534,832 |
2 | , | $470,396 | |
3 | Big Sky Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $370,868 |
4 | Hidden Lake Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $261,719 |
5 | Dan Bird | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $249,868 |
6 | Robert E Wellman Jr | Valier, MT 59486 | $242,317 |
7 | James Runningfisher | Browning, MT 59417 | $231,760 |
8 | Mountain Breeze Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $216,679 |
9 | Vermulm Farms, Inc. | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $182,525 |
10 | Michael J Loring | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $158,890 |
11 | Joan Wellman | Valier, MT 59486 | $158,290 |
12 | Rock Creek Farm Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $149,996 |
13 | Triangle Land & Livestock Co Inc | Browning, MT 59417 | $143,503 |
14 | Daniel S Barcus | Valier, MT 59486 | $135,238 |
15 | Glacier Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $131,353 |
16 | Liane Johnson Dba Lj Johnson Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $125,000 |
17 | Boundary Cattle Co Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $125,000 |
18 | Rocky Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $125,000 |
19 | Seville Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $111,387 |
20 | R L Johnson Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $106,359 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>