Total Commodity Programs in Glacier County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,059
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $140,111,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Gt Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $849,313 |
42 | T Tom Tuma | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $843,910 |
43 | David J Broberg | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $843,053 |
44 | Gerald Swenson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $834,147 |
45 | Roger Sammons | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $822,941 |
46 | Barbara Broberg | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $812,531 |
47 | Mcalpine Ranches Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $795,205 |
48 | Bradley Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $781,250 |
49 | Ricky Ray Winkowitsch | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $775,622 |
50 | Altenburg Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $774,718 |
51 | Boundary Cattle Co Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $763,929 |
52 | First State Company | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $743,961 |
53 | Wheatland Acres Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $739,345 |
54 | Barcus Ranch | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $730,724 |
55 | Glen R Pfeifer | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $718,730 |
56 | Loraine Wahl | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $712,946 |
57 | Lisa Ray Sammons | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $707,008 |
58 | Zona Swenson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $704,394 |
59 | Eney Farms 2015 | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $696,285 |
60 | Richard L Swenson Family Farm Ptn | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $692,767 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”