Emergency Conservation Program in Meagher County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 56
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Meagher County, Montana totaled $959,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Galt Ranch Lp | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $500,000 |
2 | J & L Livestock LLC | Billings, MT 59105 | $147,551 |
3 | Emerald Cross Ranch | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $36,836 |
4 | Catlin Ranch Lp | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $22,646 |
5 | Dan Rader | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $22,564 |
6 | Holmstrom Land Co Inc | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $20,084 |
7 | Ben Hurwitz | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $15,700 |
8 | Teague Ranches Inc | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $15,533 |
9 | William W Galt | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $12,151 |
10 | Grande Ranch Co | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $9,828 |
11 | Wallace L Bailey | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $9,295 |
12 | Helen E Rostad Estate | Missoula, MT 59801 | $8,805 |
13 | Springdale Colony | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $8,428 |
14 | Flying S Rch | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $8,047 |
15 | David Voldseth | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $7,923 |
16 | Richard L Indreland | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $7,868 |
17 | Lucas Ranch Inc | Ringling, MT 59642 | $6,832 |
18 | Kiff Ranch Inc | Ringling, MT 59642 | $5,984 |
19 | Bert O Williams | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $5,893 |
20 | Barry R Hedrich | Wht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645 | $5,824 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>