Emergency Conservation Program in Park County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 60
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Park County, Montana totaled $711,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lane Ranch General Partnership | Livingston, MT 59047 | $249,206 |
2 | O'hair Ranch Company | Livingston, MT 59047 | $174,201 |
3 | Arthun Ranch Inc | Wilsall, MT 59086 | $17,192 |
4 | Harms Livestock | Livingston, MT 59047 | $14,890 |
5 | Kenneth R Arthun | Wilsall, MT 59086 | $13,873 |
6 | Lane Associates | Livingston, MT 59047 | $13,788 |
7 | David Gibson | Springdale, MT 59082 | $12,899 |
8 | Jacqueline Shiplet | Livingston, MT 59047 | $11,761 |
9 | Murphy Ox Yoke Ranch Lp | Emigrant, MT 59027 | $11,033 |
10 | , | $10,800 | |
11 | Montana Ranch Company | Pray, MT 59065 | $10,572 |
12 | Westling Ranch Inc | Wilsall, MT 59086 | $10,236 |
13 | Johnstone Ranch | Wilsall, MT 59086 | $10,146 |
14 | Robert B Boyd | Clyde Park, MT 59018 | $8,993 |
15 | Gayleen Malone | Pray, MT 59065 | $8,970 |
16 | Lee A Freeman Jr | Wilsall, MT 59086 | $7,983 |
17 | Sprock Trust 79 | Wilsall, MT 59086 | $7,797 |
18 | Bert Otis | Emigrant, MT 59027 | $7,270 |
19 | Charles R Rahn | Livingston, MT 59047 | $6,184 |
20 | Raymond R Sundling | Livingston, MT 59047 | $6,104 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>