Farm Subsidy information
Powell County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Powell County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 362
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Powell County, Montana totaled $16,137,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | 5 Rockin' Ms Angus Ranch Inc | Bridgeport, TX 76426 | $223,827 |
22 | Manley Ranch | Drummond, MT 59832 | $221,232 |
23 | Mcintosh Ranch Llp | Avon, MT 59713 | $218,119 |
24 | Broken Circle Ranch Co Inc | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $215,879 |
25 | Henry H Darr | Drummond, MT 59832 | $195,392 |
26 | R Bar N Ranch LLC | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $173,067 |
27 | William Joe Applegate | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $166,417 |
28 | Melany Mannix | Avon, MT 59713 | $160,224 |
29 | Western Montana Land & Livestock LLC | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $155,559 |
30 | Mcqueary Ranch Partnership | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $149,137 |
31 | Quigley Ranch Company | Avon, MT 59713 | $137,732 |
32 | John Paul Price | Avon, MT 59713 | $131,852 |
33 | Kenneth Allen Rohrer | Volborg, MT 59351 | $123,678 |
34 | John Bignell | Avon, MT 59713 | $123,360 |
35 | Perkins Ranch LLC | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $123,183 |
36 | John P Senecal | Avon, MT 59713 | $118,622 |
37 | Charles E Beck | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $118,098 |
38 | Donald J Pocha | Helmville, MT 59843 | $104,856 |
39 | John A Hollenback | Gold Creek, MT 59733 | $104,725 |
40 | Donald Walter /dw/ Beck | Garrison, MT 59731 | $104,032 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”