Total Commodity Programs in Powell County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 98
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Powell County, Montana totaled $770,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bignell Ranch Co | Helmville, MT 59843 | $45,843 |
| 2 | Mannix Brothers Ranch LLC | Helmville, MT 59843 | $40,452 |
| 3 | Steve M Graveley | Helmville, MT 59843 | $33,139 |
| 4 | Manley Family Limited Partnership | Drummond, MT 59832 | $32,307 |
| 5 | Amadeo F Angelo | Drummond, MT 59832 | $28,720 |
| 6 | Pocha Brothers | Helmville, MT 59843 | $25,860 |
| 7 | 2-bar Ranch Limited Partnership | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $23,969 |
| 8 | Graveley Brothers, LLC. | Avon, MT 59713 | $21,940 |
| 9 | Western Montana Land & Livestock LLC | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $20,166 |
| 10 | Vanisko Ranches Inc | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $19,826 |
| 11 | Blackfoot River Ranch Inc | Helmville, MT 59843 | $19,580 |
| 12 | Benson Brothers | Avon, MT 59713 | $19,250 |
| 13 | R Bar N Ranch LLC | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $19,165 |
| 14 | Bignell Angus Ranch Inc | Avon, MT 59713 | $17,987 |
| 15 | Ted R Beck | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $17,730 |
| 16 | Perkins Ranch LLC | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $17,299 |
| 17 | Donald J Pocha Estate | Helmville, MT 59843 | $16,195 |
| 18 | Mcintosh Ranch Llp | Avon, MT 59713 | $15,637 |
| 19 | 5 Rockin' Ms Angus Ranch Inc | Bridgeport, TX 76426 | $15,210 |
| 20 | Joseph P Eve | Kalispell, MT 59904 | $14,963 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf