Total Commodity Programs in Powell County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 98
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Powell County, Montana totaled $770,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Quigley Ranch Company | Avon, MT 59713 | $14,747 |
22 | Earl Stucky | Avon, MT 59713 | $14,435 |
23 | Graveley Black Mountain Ranch LLC | Avon, MT 59713 | $14,233 |
24 | Donald Robert Beck | Gold Creek, MT 59733 | $12,623 |
25 | William Joe Applegate | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $12,506 |
26 | Leland Dutch Weaver | Drummond, MT 59832 | $11,791 |
27 | Mcqueary Ranch Partnership | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $10,741 |
28 | Geary Brothers Inc | Helmville, MT 59843 | $10,212 |
29 | Dutton Hereford Ranch | Gold Creek, MT 59733 | $7,932 |
30 | Broken Circle Ranch Co Inc | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $7,908 |
31 | Melany Mannix | Avon, MT 59713 | $7,825 |
32 | John Paul Price | Avon, MT 59713 | $7,590 |
33 | William O Pauley | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $7,426 |
34 | Donald Walter /dw/ Beck | Garrison, MT 59731 | $7,390 |
35 | Garnet Ranch Lp | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $7,325 |
36 | Thomas Herefords Inc | Gold Creek, MT 59733 | $6,501 |
37 | George M Reistad | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $6,310 |
38 | Kyle Graveley | Helmville, MT 59843 | $6,091 |
39 | Ashcraft Ranch Inc | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $5,946 |
40 | Mannix Brothers Inc | Helmville, MT 59843 | $5,904 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”