Market Gains in Boone County, Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 407
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Boone County, Nebraska totaled $8,596,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Krohn Brothers Part | Albion, NE 68620 | $209,256 |
| 2 | Thomas Donald Briese | Albion, NE 68620 | $176,435 |
| 3 | Nicholas John Gasper | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $165,562 |
| 4 | Paul A Preister | Newman Grove, NE 68758 | $148,016 |
| 5 | Jerald Martin Nebel | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $137,546 |
| 6 | Gerhard Wolf | Tilden, NE 68781 | $136,032 |
| 7 | Gene Wilfred Karmann | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $117,565 |
| 8 | Groeteke Brothers Partnership | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $113,367 |
| 9 | Michael Lynn Wolf | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $107,497 |
| 10 | Duane Lawrence Choat | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $101,996 |
| 11 | Paul Anthony Weeder | Albion, NE 68620 | $98,537 |
| 12 | Ck Farms Inc | Albion, NE 68620 | $95,657 |
| 13 | Kruse Farms Inc | Albion, NE 68620 | $94,932 |
| 14 | Tisthammer Farms Part | Albion, NE 68620 | $94,111 |
| 15 | Taake Bros | Meadow Grove, NE 68752 | $93,235 |
| 16 | Triple G Farming Gen Part | Clarks, NE 68628 | $89,323 |
| 17 | Ronald Lee Laska | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $83,777 |
| 18 | Harley George Guthard | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $83,153 |
| 19 | Jlca Inc | Albion, NE 68620 | $82,689 |
| 20 | Jewell Dennis Hemmingsen | Primrose, NE 68655 | $81,194 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf