Direct Payment Program in Custer County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,716
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Custer County, Nebraska totaled $68,265,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Dean Peterson | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $157,563 |
122 | Oakley Farms | Merna, NE 68856 | $157,168 |
123 | Blowers Farms LLC | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $156,562 |
124 | Jolene M Olson Revocable Trust | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $156,556 |
125 | Brent L Dittmar | Oconto, NE 68860 | $156,530 |
126 | Russell Ray Arnold | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $156,023 |
127 | Jerry E Haumont | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $155,641 |
128 | Larry G Slingsby | Ansley, NE 68814 | $154,691 |
129 | Leonard Joseph Daake | Merna, NE 68856 | $153,589 |
130 | Jolene Viola Anderson | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $151,851 |
131 | Merton James Thompson | Milburn, NE 68813 | $150,285 |
132 | Greg Kent Mcfarland | Oconto, NE 68860 | $150,255 |
133 | Arrow P Farms Inc | Oconto, NE 68860 | $150,143 |
134 | E Eugene John Andre | Arnold, NE 69120 | $149,954 |
135 | Ross Owen Inc | Callaway, NE 68825 | $148,766 |
136 | Donna Rae Downey | Merna, NE 68856 | $148,595 |
137 | Jack Irwin Longfellow | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $148,273 |
138 | Lester Roger Mills | Arnold, NE 69120 | $147,308 |
139 | Mark Edward Pandorf | Callaway, NE 68825 | $145,397 |
140 | Keith Alan Maline | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $144,040 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”