Loan Deficiency in Custer County, Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,306
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Custer County, Nebraska totaled $42,865,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adams Farm Partnership | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $864,638 |
| 2 | Safranek Irrigation | Merna, NE 68856 | $773,480 |
| 3 | Tri-s Ag | Merna, NE 68856 | $640,215 |
| 4 | Clarence Davenport Living Trust | Arnold, NE 69120 | $437,930 |
| 5 | Adams Land & Cattle, LLC | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $431,403 |
| 6 | Pirnie Bros Investment Co | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $390,576 |
| 7 | S & S Farms | Arnold, NE 69120 | $330,544 |
| 8 | Frank Bartak Partnership | Merna, NE 68856 | $303,139 |
| 9 | Donald David Cantrell | Merna, NE 68856 | $302,643 |
| 10 | Debra Diane Cantrell | Merna, NE 68856 | $302,643 |
| 11 | Garry Lee Coleman | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $288,940 |
| 12 | J Michael Christensen Revoc Trust | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $276,774 |
| 13 | Michael T Christensen Rev Tr | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $270,517 |
| 14 | Karen Louise Safranek | Merna, NE 68856 | $266,623 |
| 15 | Gerald Alan Safranek | Merna, NE 68856 | $266,623 |
| 16 | Deborah Lea Coleman | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $259,830 |
| 17 | Jimmy Joe Coleman | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $240,023 |
| 18 | Glen Govier & Sons | Sargent, NE 68874 | $236,807 |
| 19 | Young Acres Inc | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $233,513 |
| 20 | Mark W Slagle | Sargent, NE 68874 | $232,811 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf