Farm Subsidy information
Douglas County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Douglas County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,191
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Douglas County, Nebraska totaled $72,676,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Mylan Lamprecht | Waterloo, NE 68069 | $187,015 |
82 | Akerlund Farms Inc | Aurora, NE 68818 | $186,590 |
83 | Sweetwater Inc | Valley, NE 68064 | $184,030 |
84 | Scott Fjell | Milford, NE 68405 | $183,235 |
85 | Ray C Logemann | Bennington, NE 68007 | $182,085 |
86 | Frances J Akerlund | Valley, NE 68064 | $181,960 |
87 | Scott E Bruhn Ent Inc | Elkhorn, NE 68022 | $176,285 |
88 | Platte River Farm | Omaha, NE 68112 | $175,988 |
89 | Darrell J Logemann | Bennington, NE 68007 | $174,290 |
90 | Vicki S Wollen | Yutan, NE 68073 | $171,560 |
91 | Lawrence E Jacobsen | Omaha, NE 68122 | $171,309 |
92 | James L Appleby | Bennington, NE 68007 | $169,873 |
93 | George Whitmore Jr | Omaha, NE 68122 | $167,958 |
94 | Dwayne A Donahoo | Elkhorn, NE 68022 | $167,290 |
95 | Victor Vanarsdel | Bennington, NE 68007 | $166,614 |
96 | Fritz Eipperle III | Bennington, NE 68007 | $166,063 |
97 | Roy L Paasch Rev Trust | Elkhorn, NE 68022 | $161,392 |
98 | John Allen | Valley, NE 68064 | $157,932 |
99 | Accent Nursery LLC | Waterloo, NE 68069 | $157,796 |
100 | Schaefer Farms Inc | Omaha, NE 68142 | $157,638 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”