Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Harlan County, Nebraska, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 133
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Harlan County, Nebraska totaled $488,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Michael D Bartels | Holdrege, NE 68949 | $2,077 |
62 | Mitchell R Schultz | Oxford, NE 68967 | $2,032 |
63 | Gary W Jensen | Wilcox, NE 68982 | $1,960 |
64 | Foster Creek Farms Inc | Oxford, NE 68967 | $1,915 |
65 | Larry Beahm- Larry And Tania Beahm Trust Dated The | Alma, NE 68920 | $1,883 |
66 | Allen Brugh | Republican City, NE 68971 | $1,776 |
67 | Joe Schluntz | Republican City, NE 68971 | $1,702 |
68 | Gary L Dunse | Alma, NE 68920 | $1,691 |
69 | Loyd Lowe | Republican City, NE 68971 | $1,684 |
70 | Roy Dean Stutterheim | Prairie View, KS 67664 | $1,622 |
71 | Matthew E Broeker | Oxford, NE 68967 | $1,507 |
72 | Avery K Thalheim | Long Island, KS 67647 | $1,447 |
73 | Steven Blank | Wilcox, NE 68982 | $1,441 |
74 | Douglas Winz | Holdrege, NE 68949 | $1,439 |
75 | , | $1,437 | |
76 | Joel L Laurin | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $1,283 |
77 | Kent Thalheim | Long Island, KS 67647 | $1,248 |
78 | Kayne Backes Molzahn | Naponee, NE 68960 | $1,233 |
79 | Lee Lubeck | Stamford, NE 68977 | $1,226 |
80 | David L Culver | Orleans, NE 68966 | $1,216 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”