Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Harlan County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 280
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Harlan County, Nebraska totaled $4,716,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Haussermann Cattle Co | Republican City, NE 68971 | $260,316 |
2 | Keo Ranch Inc | Orleans, NE 68966 | $245,892 |
3 | P-bar Farms Inc | Orleans, NE 68966 | $144,550 |
4 | D M Schluntz Corp | Republican City, NE 68971 | $117,219 |
5 | Jeff Swanson | Oxford, NE 68967 | $112,704 |
6 | Greg Christensen | Alma, NE 68920 | $110,003 |
7 | Kauk Brothers Partnership | Alma, NE 68920 | $80,910 |
8 | Gary Stoelting | Orleans, NE 68966 | $72,872 |
9 | James Stoelting | Orleans, NE 68966 | $72,872 |
10 | Bose Bros Inc | Orleans, NE 68966 | $64,642 |
11 | Bose Farm Corporation | Orleans, NE 68966 | $64,006 |
12 | Hunt Cd Bar Inc | Oxford, NE 68967 | $63,768 |
13 | James Drake | Alma, NE 68920 | $61,832 |
14 | Ivey Enterprises Inc | Oxford, NE 68967 | $61,192 |
15 | David Schubert | Wilcox, NE 68982 | $59,929 |
16 | Bradley L Barwick | Orleans, NE 68966 | $59,753 |
17 | Greg Lennemann | Stamford, NE 68977 | $59,348 |
18 | Paul F Horwart | Stamford, NE 68977 | $55,791 |
19 | Paul Vincent | Long Island, KS 67647 | $52,906 |
20 | Matthew O Schultz | Orleans, NE 68966 | $51,315 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>