Total Conservation Programs in Pawnee County, Nebraska, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 221
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Pawnee County, Nebraska totaled $1,075,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nemechek Bros | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $57,612 |
| 2 | Scott Bodie | Burchard, NE 68323 | $40,145 |
| 3 | Lee Rottman | Pawnee City, NE 68420 | $37,449 |
| 4 | John Wiers | Pawnee City, NE 68420 | $33,622 |
| 5 | Beverley A Rottman | Pawnee City, NE 68420 | $26,520 |
| 6 | Monty Gottula | Elk Creek, NE 68348 | $21,238 |
| 7 | Constance Anderson | Lincoln, NE 68516 | $19,579 |
| 8 | Mccune Family LLC | Gretna, NE 68028 | $18,786 |
| 9 | Kent Hippen | Virginia, NE 68458 | $18,538 |
| 10 | Dale Hippen | Tecumseh, NE 68450 | $18,259 |
| 11 | Billie Kay Bodie | Burchard, NE 68323 | $18,153 |
| 12 | Larry G Habegger | Pawnee City, NE 68420 | $17,135 |
| 13 | Duane David Farm LLC | Springfield, NE 68059 | $16,842 |
| 14 | Wayne L Morton | Osceola, MO 64776 | $15,741 |
| 15 | State Bank Of Table Rock ** | Table Rock, NE 68447 | $15,480 |
| 16 | Loren Joe Stehlik | Pawnee City, NE 68420 | $15,458 |
| 17 | Phillip Hartman | Pawnee City, NE 68420 | $13,911 |
| 18 | Nebrazona Farms Inc | Mesa, AZ 85202 | $13,524 |
| 19 | Luella Hinrichsen | Du Bois, NE 68345 | $13,473 |
| 20 | Wayne E Cacek | Burchard, NE 68323 | $13,070 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf