Direct Payment Program in Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,066
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska totaled $26,636,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Hessler Farming & Feeding Inc | Mitchell, NE 69357 | $104,794 |
42 | Jusnuff Ltd | Mitchell, NE 69357 | $100,736 |
43 | Randy Huck | Bayard, NE 69334 | $99,345 |
44 | Gregory N Peterson | Gering, NE 69341 | $99,277 |
45 | Keller Brothers Farms Inc | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $98,848 |
46 | Ross Ag Inc | Gering, NE 69341 | $97,183 |
47 | Rodney Schaneman | Melbeta, NE 69355 | $95,930 |
48 | Rod Adams Farms Inc | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $95,092 |
49 | Tim Carlson | Minatare, NE 69356 | $94,111 |
50 | Senkel Farms Inc | Lyman, NE 69352 | $90,895 |
51 | Gary W Wiedeman | Greeley, CO 80634 | $90,678 |
52 | James Arthur Maser | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $89,895 |
53 | John Eric Maser | Gering, NE 69341 | $89,892 |
54 | Mario C Pitts | Lyman, NE 69352 | $89,885 |
55 | Chapman Brothers | Lyman, NE 69352 | $89,884 |
56 | Stephen Johnson | Lagrange, WY 82221 | $88,343 |
57 | Mark L Spencer | Mitchell, NE 69357 | $86,224 |
58 | B W Roberts | Bayard, NE 69334 | $86,069 |
59 | Nazarian Marital Tr Est By 12/20 | Gering, NE 69341 | $84,765 |
60 | Tim Schwartzkopf | Mitchell, NE 69357 | $84,472 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”