Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Sherman County, Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 26
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Sherman County, Nebraska totaled $79,826 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schmitz Farms Inc | Kearney, NE 68845 | $10,257 |
| 2 | Dale Schroll | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $6,047 |
| 3 | Gordon C Schroll Revocable Trust | Riverdale, NE 68870 | $6,046 |
| 4 | E Lavern Oseka | Loup City, NE 68853 | $5,970 |
| 5 | Middle Loup Grazing Association | Loup City, NE 68853 | $4,247 |
| 6 | Joe Hickman | Loup City, NE 68853 | $3,578 |
| 7 | Bochart Farms Inc | Rockville, NE 68871 | $3,130 |
| 8 | Cob Creek Badlands | Loup City, NE 68853 | $3,081 |
| 9 | Rodney Kieborz | Litchfield, NE 68852 | $3,047 |
| 10 | Roy D Schmidt | Hazard, NE 68844 | $2,672 |
| 11 | Milan Larson | Hazard, NE 68844 | $2,645 |
| 12 | Floyd A Fowler | Arcadia, NE 68815 | $2,598 |
| 13 | Richard Ritz | Ashton, NE 68817 | $2,578 |
| 14 | Rita K Shoemaker | North Loup, NE 68859 | $2,546 |
| 15 | James D Shoemaker | North Loup, NE 68859 | $2,546 |
| 16 | John Henry Guthard | Hazard, NE 68844 | $2,475 |
| 17 | Maxine Chelewski Consvsp | Litchfield, NE 68852 | $2,389 |
| 18 | Kevin Jorgensen | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $2,252 |
| 19 | Dennis Krolikowski | Loup City, NE 68853 | $2,045 |
| 20 | Carol Ann Bandur | Loup City, NE 68853 | $1,835 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf