Farm Subsidy information
Elko County, Nevada
Total Subsidies in Elko County, Nevada, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 592
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Elko County, Nevada totaled $74,047,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | J Bar M Ranching Co | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $314,018 |
42 | Neff Livestock & Equipment | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $313,314 |
43 | Lamar Roche | Parma, ID 83660 | $307,777 |
44 | Carroll Buster Wines | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $304,686 |
45 | Salmon River Cattlemens Assoc Inc | Twin Falls, ID 83303 | $302,481 |
46 | Zunino Livestock | Spring Creek, NV 89815 | $279,376 |
47 | Mc Ranch Company LLC | Elko, NV 89801 | $263,548 |
48 | W L Livestock LLC | Wells, NV 89835 | $242,027 |
49 | Merkley Ranches Inc | Spring Creek, NV 89815 | $240,075 |
50 | Dixie Valley Cattle LLC | Hagerman, ID 83332 | $239,029 |
51 | Thompson Creek Ranch LLC | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $227,014 |
52 | Howell Ranch LLC | Deeth, NV 89823 | $225,348 |
53 | Winecup Inc | Oakley, ID 83346 | $219,619 |
54 | Elias Fernando Gicochea Trust | Elko, NV 89801 | $216,363 |
55 | Dean Stitzel | Elko, NV 89801 | $209,397 |
56 | 7-h Ranch LLC | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $202,835 |
57 | Marjorie Rose Vipham | Mountain City, NV 89831 | $202,474 |
58 | Dusty C Roche | Tremonton, UT 84337 | $201,680 |
59 | Justin J Roche | Garland, UT 84312 | $199,028 |
60 | Henry C Vogler Iv | Ely, NV 89301 | $198,702 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”