Total Commodity Programs in Elko County, Nevada, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 142
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Elko County, Nevada totaled $1,564,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glaser Land & Livestock Company | Elko, NV 89801 | $72,064 |
| 2 | Martha Hoots | Deeth, NV 89823 | $64,732 |
| 3 | Brough Livestock LLC | Wells, NV 89835 | $57,050 |
| 4 | Wade Small | Mountain City, NV 89831 | $54,625 |
| 5 | Sharon L Rhoads | Tuscarora, NV 89834 | $53,735 |
| 6 | Dalton Livestock LLC | Wells, NV 89835 | $49,521 |
| 7 | Scott Mclachlan | Lehi, UT 84043 | $42,785 |
| 8 | Barnes Ranches Inc | Spring Creek, NV 89815 | $41,899 |
| 9 | Egbert Livestock LLC | Wells, NV 89835 | $39,889 |
| 10 | Mori Ranches LLC | Tuscarora, NV 89834 | $32,325 |
| 11 | Ftz Cattle LLC | Midas, NV 89414 | $31,880 |
| 12 | Boies Ranch Inc | Wells, NV 89835 | $31,209 |
| 13 | Marys River Ranch | Deeth, NV 89823 | $31,186 |
| 14 | Duval Ranching Co | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $30,537 |
| 15 | Thompson Creek Ranch LLC | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $26,862 |
| 16 | David D Iveson | Wells, NV 89835 | $24,160 |
| 17 | Dawley Creek Ranch Nv LLC | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $23,442 |
| 18 | Christopher Collis | Mc Gill, NV 89318 | $23,176 |
| 19 | K & N Livestock LLC | Carlin, NV 89822 | $23,058 |
| 20 | Sadler Ranch LLC | Forest Knolls, CA 94933 | $21,813 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf