Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Elko County, Nevada, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 132
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Elko County, Nevada totaled $5,035,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dean And Sharon Rhoads Trust | Tuscarora, NV 89834 | $252,859 |
2 | Heguy Ranch LLC | Elko, NV 89803 | $233,289 |
3 | Dean A Rhoads | Tuscarora, NV 89834 | $233,048 |
4 | Salmon River Cattlemens Assoc Inc | Twin Falls, ID 83303 | $197,022 |
5 | Boies Ranch Inc | Wells, NV 89835 | $169,080 |
6 | Carroll Buster Wines | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $152,681 |
7 | 7-h Ranch LLC | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $137,058 |
8 | Sharon L Rhoads | Tuscarora, NV 89834 | $136,088 |
9 | Van Norman Ranches Inc | Tuscarora, NV 89834 | $133,932 |
10 | Wendell Neff Company | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $131,187 |
11 | Duval Ranching Co | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $124,179 |
12 | Reed Ranching Co Inc | Spring Creek, NV 89815 | $122,387 |
13 | 7c Ranch | Elko, NV 89801 | $119,888 |
14 | Martha Hoots | Deeth, NV 89823 | $119,527 |
15 | Boyd Ranch LLC | Elko, NV 89801 | $113,035 |
16 | Buckle D Ranch | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $101,972 |
17 | Glaser Land & Livestock Company | Elko, NV 89801 | $95,682 |
18 | Steve Neff Company | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $90,824 |
19 | Neil Mcqueary | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $90,776 |
20 | Wh Gibbs Company | Wells, NV 89835 | $86,862 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>