Farm Subsidy information
Elko County, Nevada
Total Subsidies in Elko County, Nevada, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 172
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Elko County, Nevada totaled $17,149,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Winecup Inc | Oakley, ID 83346 | $67,481 |
22 | Whitaker Ranch LLC | Deeth, NV 89823 | $67,123 |
23 | Heguy Ranch LLC | Elko, NV 89803 | $65,932 |
24 | Martha Hoots | Deeth, NV 89823 | $64,732 |
25 | Dawley Creek Ranch Nv LLC | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $61,713 |
26 | The Pete And Rama Paris Family Trust | Spring Creek, NV 89815 | $61,231 |
27 | Boyd Ranch LLC | Elko, NV 89801 | $60,241 |
28 | Jess Sustacha Ranches Lp | Lamoille, NV 89828 | $59,922 |
29 | Zunino Ranches Inc | Spring Creek, NV 89815 | $55,367 |
30 | J & M Livestock LLC | Wells, NV 89835 | $55,362 |
31 | Neff Livestock & Equipment | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $54,476 |
32 | Desatoya Land And Livestock, LLC | Battle Mountain, NV 89820 | $50,012 |
33 | 75 Ranching LLC | Lamoille, NV 89828 | $48,440 |
34 | Wendell Neff Company | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $47,347 |
35 | Neil Mcqueary | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $45,526 |
36 | David D Iveson | Wells, NV 89835 | $44,939 |
37 | Reverse Fp Ranch LLC | Lamoille, NV 89828 | $44,662 |
38 | Jessie A Nuttall | Fallon, NV 89406 | $43,397 |
39 | Scott Mclachlan | Lehi, UT 84043 | $42,785 |
40 | Mathews Farms | Panaca, NV 89042 | $42,765 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”